(0) Comments | join the conversation »

“You’re a great woman. You deserve a great man. For just $24.95 an hour.”
–The Stud on Jack Donaghy’s Porn for Women Network

We’re bursting with pride here at the Cambridge Women’s Pornography Cooperative now that 30 Rock’s Jack Donaghy has announced that his “amazing new business idea” is to establish a groundbreaking new pay-per-view channel modeled [...]

(1) Comment | join the conversation »

Well, it may not be grammatically correct for “we” to say “I told you so” but you catch our drift when we say that this article from the Wall Street Journal confirms what we have been saying the whole time:  Women love it when men pitch in around the house.  We didn’t spend [...]

(0) Comments | join the conversation »

This just in: while Parenting.com is swooning over our men who get “down and dirty with cleaning supplies,” they are shocked to report that a dirt-free domestic situation in Germany recently resulted in divorce. After her too-tidy husband insisted on knocking down a filthy wall, one woman decided it was time to make a break. [...]

(0) Comments | join the conversation »

Breaking research news: women all over America agree that their honeys don’t need reasons to give them flowers.
Here at the CWPC, we’ve just received official word from Chronicle Books that hundreds of women have already entered the Porn for Women Caption Contest, all jumping at the chance to win a dazzling bouquet of blossoms. One [...]

(7) Comments | join the conversation »

While conducting classified research for our latest study on what really turns women on, we encountered a feisty male test subject with one provocative and persistent question: what about porn for men? Porn for Women model Adrian Madlener, 32, emphasized that after posing for photo after photo in our publications, he simply could not let [...]

(3) Comments | join the conversation »

While Marci’s running in horror from her local Urban Outfitters, our pals over at Glamour have figured out that when we say porn, we really mean, “More chocolates, please!” Glamour editor Erin Zammett wrote this friendly little post about our latest title, and started a fun thread. (Glamour gals, mind if we borrow an idea or two a future title? We’ll send over the lads for chair massages and dinner. Do we have a deal?)

(1) Comment | join the conversation »

We always suspected that Porn for Women was appalling—for guys,
anyway. We can’t help but imagine them whining, when suddenly
confronted with the unvarnished truth about how best to score
points with their partners. (But, guys, `fess up! You knew it
all along, right?)

(0) Comments | join the conversation »

Though we here at the Cambridge Women’s Pornography Cooperative pride ourselves on our cutting edge research, we’re not above giving credit where credit’s due. And, this past week, we learned of some rather hot and sudsy findings from our peers in academia. Specifically, this MSNBC article, Gals make passes at guys who wash glasses came [...]

(4) Comments | join the conversation »

Never a dull day at the Cambridge Women’s Pornography Cooperative (CWPC). Driven by demand for our first book, Porn for Women, the CWPC lab is running at full tilt as our team analyzes the reams of data collected from our most recent study, Porn for New Moms. Hot stuff! (Stay tuned: We’ll publish those findings in the spring.)

With that knowledge in hand, we’ve begun research for Phase 3 of the Porn for Women analysis. We know everyone wants different things, so we’re asking a brand new batch of recruits to tell us what really turns them on - and we need you!

So what’s your ultimate Porn for Women fantasy?

Tell us in the comments section below (ok, be anonymous if you’re shy). And please feel free to enlighten your friends with this call to action. We’ll gather the best responses into our forthcoming collection of Porn for Women.

(1) Comment | join the conversation »

We’ve noticed something really interesting here at the Cambridge Women’s Pornography Cooperative (CWPC). Like proud but nervous parents headed to a parent-teacher conference, we read our first book’s reviews on Amazon with bated breath. Hearing what people think of our work is more than mildly obsessive. But we just don’t know what to make of our baby’s grades: all A’s…and F’s?! Talk about extremes. In Amazon’s five-star rating system, Porn for Women has received zero lukewarm 3-star ratings, just resounding applause or jeering boo’s. Guess you either love it or you hate it.

So, our book gets some really negative reviews:

“In a world where real progressive women are out to demonstrate that their sex can have ambitions as grand and respectable as men, this book decides to step in and say ‘All women care about is housework *tee-hee!*’ One page features the model saying ‘Why don’t I buy a minivan so you can drive something fun?’ What’s the message here? That it’s better to be dependant on your partner’s income than to go out and earn a car by yourself?