A post about awesome, wonderful public men– this is it. It isn’t porn.

Porn means “graphically depicted sexual entertainment that gets me off.”

What you are producing is “relational wishfulfillment imagery.” I can roll with that, I love me some wishfulfillment fantasy. I fulfill all kinds of wishes– I look at guitar and clothing catalogues, imagine a clean kitchen, fame and fortune in my career. All of them very gratifying. BUT! I LOVE sex, and when I look at or read porn, there are people doing the deed.

Calling non sexual material ‘porn for women’ plays into the cultural that women don’t actually like sex. This does no one any favors. For one thing, as a friend of mine pointed out, it makes for disbelief when women say they don’t want to have sex. It makes women who say they Do want to have sex, suspect. It makes liars out of ALL of us. And even contributes to the idea that women need to be raped, in a worst-case scenario– a worst case that exists all to sadly often.

Look, there is a wonderful new movement afoot, to recognise asexuality as something legitimate. There are male and female aces, and if you are one– claim it. Let this site be; “Porn for asexuals.”

Do not assume the right to claim your interests for all the millions of women that exist in this world. That’s…

Well, it’s rude. And wrong.

At the moment the books contain a wonderful diversity of men of different ages, ethnic groups and body types that works well to cater for most womens fantasies.

I don’t beleive that using attractive men in the photos detracts from the supportive and loving messages in the text in any way.

Also, I really love that this post focuses so much on the personality of the men in question. I’d like to add Jaoquin Phoenix to the list, as he’s an incredible actor, an animal rights advocate and has done incredibly well considering his horrific upbringing in the ‘Children of God’ cult.

Love your ideas!